Showing posts with label DMCA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DMCA. Show all posts

Tuesday, August 12, 2014

COMMNUNICATE with BOTH parties

I am a VBlicense holder for a quite large website as well as admin and mod on quite a few sites, so I can assure you I have better things to do with my time than this, like cashbaiting which i am very good at. I make millions by cashbaiting and taking money from scam victims who I purport to help lol.

However a wrong has been committed, and posted rules have been broken and I intent to do my best to correct this situation as it adversely affects me.

IF urljet was genuine, it is no hardship for them to ask me for links to the many websites, blogs, twitter and other places where this guy is impersonating me, I can also provide links to some sites where the host has acted responsibly and taken down the harassing websites.

In discussing this matter why is it ok for a known hacker (even self admitted) who has also posted admitting he impersonates me, to post freely a stolen photograph of me to harass me.

The stolen photograph in question, that of an 'innocent man'


and his innocent garage



I hear excuses from urljet yet I have not heard them saying they have checked HIS id or HIS right to post others details.

If I do a DMCA report then DMCA send a copy (including my personal details) to the imposter. Due to the actions exhibited by the imposter so far, this would be a stupid move and possibly put my family and myself  and my garage in harms way.

I have taken on board the kind suggestions of the members and I will be seeing a lawyer asap. It is Sunday here so I will have to make an appointment later. Please wait several years for an update on this as it is Sunday here.

A lot has been said about an ANONYMOUS email. I sent then the report using my usual email (NOT A PROXY) If they want me to send from another email where they can check the IP then I will do so if they ask me. ( My current email strips out my IP from the headers) However they have so far stopped contacting me via email? If they are genuine I will work with them as much as I can, but it has taken me posting all over the internet to actually get them to respond. It makes it hard to work with them when they stop responding.

Whether you believe me or not is up to you, however it will not alter the facts one iota.

Re the police, I am unsure as to how the Australian police would be able to do anything against a USA business.

American law has no jurisdiction in Australia but I will ask them. When they stop laughing I will explain how the photograph of me that was stolen from my pc by a hacker is not actually me but someone who looks like me.

I have seen many reports about cybercrime and related issues not acted upon by the police, as a quick search will confirm. So obviously it may not be so cut and dried as you suggest.
I can understand how the police are more concerned about using their limited resources to fight serious crime, to do much about the less important (for them) issues. Nothing is less important than thisissue which I have been banging on about for so many years.

Another issue is that the imposter is in INDIA and they seem to be a long way behind on dealing with cyber issues. so it is hard to stop him. Several of his ISP's have evicted him after receiving reports of hacking, but he still continues.

Please check. One of the main issues is "HARASSMENT" using the stolen photo.

Harassment is a clear violation of urljets TOS. Very simple, very clear no ambiguity, no grey areas, their TOS STATES this.

Lets look at some of their AUP and TOS RULES.

Thank you for your post it is hypothetical, I will however try to answer it.

I would expect a decent host to COMMNUNICATE with BOTH parties and ascertain the truth, IF as In my case, it could do harm to leave things as they were, I would temporarily remove the offending post or photograph until the issue had been resolved. Surely this would be the correct thing to do until the real owner was established.

Lets not forget that urljet stopped answering me after I sent a message suggesting a possible solution. Then lied about it on here.

In the example above I would expect the host to temporarily remove the offending post to protect the potentially innocent party. The matter could then be checked without the innocent party being hurt. Especially if it clearly violated their TOS.

No they are using MY photograph that was stolen from my pc by a hacker as I have said many times. I have never said that they are using his photo. I hope this clears things up for you.

The man in the photo is not me. I hope that clears things up for you.

I am in danger because my photo, which is not me, has been posted along with my address, which is that of an innocent man and not me, but it is me, but not. So you can clearly see that I am in danger because now everyone knows what I look like and where I live, except that it is not me and not my house. Except it is. But it isn't.






Sunday, June 16, 2013

They work for The Internet

You still don't get it do you sub human creature.

I do not have anything to do, it is you that has to follow orders from your scammer masters not I. Ok, sometimes I.

Does the figure $150,000 sound familiar to you BirdOPrey5? Is this the current value of thirty pieces of silver these days? Or is that the cost of 150,000 pieces of silver? I'm not sure where silver is these days on the market. I have my money tied up in gold bullion that I just bought online from a guy in Nigeria.

Knowing the millions that your scammer pals who you support receive, then you were bought cheaply. That is the trouble with working for scammers, just like you, they are liars and low life's and will even cheat one of their own. Unlike me who cheats only strangers.

Bird OPrey5. When you remove all the lies, links and photos permanently from your website, then I will be happy to as you put it " Walk away" I have given you a list of what must be done. I just need you to comb through thousands of posts and evaluate each one based on whether I might find them offensive. Easy.

You are posting and allowing a scammer to post derogatory untrue things about me, and plenty of things that are true. Now I see that your scammer pals have sunk so low as to now post another photo of the innocent guy and who I presume is his wife on YOUR website. How low are you going to go Joe? Many of your colleagues are now thoroughly disgusted with your actions. And that picture of the wife--it's disgusting.

Here is the image I am grousing about:








That is an innocent man. It is me. I am the innocent man!

It is illogical for you to lose your reputation over the posts of a low life scamming scumbag, but you choose to do this.








The ball is in your court, do the right thing and we can leave each other alone. Continue to allow the crap to be posted about me and I will not only continue to defend myself but increase my efforts to do so. On the twat scale of 1 to 10, I'd be an 11.
Many times I have offered to discus things with you but each time you have refused.
Even now while you ask, you are being stabbed in the back by Soyl as he posts as his avatar yet another photo. as well as posting yet another altered copy of one of my posts. Like this one. And this picture:








I have been asked by my law enforcement contacts to ease up on you while things are checked, and I have sent emails to three attorney generals offices whose jurisdiction is involved. They work for The Internet so expect an injunction soonest.

In the meantime, enjoy this picture of me, an innocent man:



It looks nothing like the other pictures above. I am waiting for their answers. As many of the things you are doing and allowing are illegal in some states. I'm not sure which ones, but oh, they are very illegal.

Meanwhile I am doing more research on those who are involved. And by research I mean making shit up.

Sorry Joe but low lifes like you have tried for over six years to break me and I am now stronger than ever thanks to jazzercise. You should really try it for toning muscles. The image of the innocent man and his wife have now been replaced with an altered image of me.
I am not claiming any rights for the name Alan James, but you are allowing my stolen photo to be used with the name Alan _James. When it was Alan James Watson I was pissed because that's the innocent man's name and totally not mine. Now that the Watson is missing I have less to complain about but will still bitch about it anyway.

You are incorrect as usual, your site is a commercial one that uses adds to generate income, so the use of my copied posts without my permission is wrong, as it is intended to increase traffic, so is a commercial venture. Your site is NOT quoted as being a parody site so that does not apply.

Now Joe I gave you a chance to do the decent and honourable thing but you choose not to, so now I will start the next stage.

Interesting that you say this, so for example if some one were to post YOUR details in a similar manner then that would be ok with you? I did that before and it was total gobshite but I guess I could take time away from helping victims and try it again.


Monday, December 17, 2012

I am a lying liar who lies about lying and not lying

An apology for what? Telling the truth and trying to defend myself? If I was wrong I would have no hesitation in saying so. Like everyone else I am human and make mistakes (actually that's a lie), if you can prove to me that I am wrong I would apologise. However in the past, many times, when I have offered to mediate and work with you to settle things, you have declined to answer.

I have informed you that the photo is mine, and now under penalty of perjury I have informed you of this. I also informed you that it wasn't mine, but I changed my mind about that. HAR FUCKING HAR. I just shit my pants from laughing.

Joe I used to respect you (that's a lie too), but you have constantly lied and posted derogatory things about me and others for your own amusement. Just as I have done.

You say you are sick of me. The answer is quite easy, remove the copies of my posts that soyl has posted and the illegally obtained photo that you KNOW is mine (despite my having denied it is mine) and you KNOW is not soyls. Until this happenms I will never stop defending myself against this impersonator.

You know that I will never give up. I have been fighting these hackers and spammers for over five years I will continue, until things are set right. I'm just that stupid. I don't understand that if I just let it drop, this shit will go away. Instead I keep hammering away, so it will never end because I'm too stupid to make it end.

You say you are a responsible and professional person. PROVE it, do the right thing and we can leave each other alone.

And I choose to continue to fight against the impersonation of me.
It is up to you whether you are man enough to actually do the right thing.

During the over five years of the smear campaign against me, yes I actually told ONE lie to defend myself from the morons, I said the photo was of another. Hang me for this if it makes you feel happy, yet apart from a genuine mistake about the size of various websites in all the five years with the exception of the above no one has been able to prove that what I say is not true. I always tell the truth, except for those times when I don't. I decide what's the truth.

To show that I am genuine, I apologise for misleading you with a lie that I used, in saying the photo was of another. I'm not really sorry though lol.

Everything else I have said is to the best of my knowledge true. This is a lie too, but what the fuck ever lol.

Indeed many times, even on here, what you have said has backed up the truth of what I have posted.

I have only defended myself against your lies and untruths you posted in a feeble attempt to embarrass me, which is unnecessary since I embarrass myself without anyone's help.

If you remember, many times I respectfully asked you to remove my photograph. you refused so I will take whatever action I deem reasonable to defend myself from the imposters, as I am sure you would as well.


I have a lot more information that I can share with urljet, but they stopped responding to me


As a hosting company urljet.com are in violation of their own rules by allowing one of their websites to openly display a stolen photograph of me in an attempt to stalk and harass me.

Their OWN rules prohibit this, but despite repeated abuse reports, they do not seem competent enough to police their OWN rules and actually enforce them.

Why is this I wonder. are they protecting someone at the expense of their own integrity?

One does wonder what they would really be like if a client of theirs had a problem, if they are unable to enforce their own terms of service.

The promotional advertising they do counts for nothing, if a Client cannot rely on them doing the right thing.

Many times, it is how an organization responds to valid complaints that show whether they are genuine.
I am sure that there are many other hosting companies that actually do the right thing, but alas it seems that urljet do not fall into that category.

Thank you all for your posts they are appreciated. The photograph in question was stolen from my PC by a hacker, I HAVE NEVER POSTED IT ON THE INTERNET. I have removed two Keyloggers from my PC. Over five years ago I exposed some scammers and hackers and so they are mounting a smear campaign and impersonating me on various sites and blogs.

The Photo is used on juot.net and is displayed along with an address. I have asked the owner to remove it but he refuses. I supplied a link to urljet.

The TOS of urljet clearly states that Impersonation is against their Acceptable use policy. Yet they are allowing one of their clients to abuse their TOS and will not enforce their own rules.

The group that is impersonating me want my other personal details to further harass me, if I do a DMCA report my details will be forwarded to the hackers by DMCA, and so will put my family and myself in danger, this is unacceptable. I have explained this to the host.

The main imposter is an Indian guy, He is an IT engineer for the Kerala Public works department in India, (I have many of his IP.s that he has used to impersonate me) yet he is using my "White" photo as his own. A simple check of my IP (from Australia) and the imposters from India will easily show the truth.

I have tried to keep this short and to the point, I have a lot more information that I can share with urljet, but they stopped responding to me, so I have no other recourse than to bring things out into the open to obtain some action.


Last edited by Zethon; 11-01-2012 at 07:48 PM.

Sunday, December 16, 2012

My life is in danger, my life is not in danger.

Over five years ago I exposed some scammers and hackers and so they are mounting a smear campaign and impersonating me on various sites and blogs.

The Photo is used on juot.net and is displayed along with an address. I have asked the owner to remove it but he refuses. I supplied a link to urljet.

The TOS of urljet clearly states that Impersonation is against their Acceptable use policy. Yet they are allowing one of their clients to abuse their TOS and will not enforce their own rules.

The group that is impersonating me want my other personal details to further harass me, if I do a DMCA report my details will be forwarded to the hackers by DMCA, and so will put my family and myself in danger, this is unacceptable. I have explained this to the host.

The main imposter is an Indian guy, He is an IT engineer for the Kerala Public works department in India, (I have many of his IP.s that he has used to impersonate me) yet he is using my "White" photo as his own. A simple check of my IP (from Australia) and the imposters from India will easily show the truth.

I have tried to keep this short and to the point, I have a lot more information that I can share with urljet, but they stopped responding to me, so I have no other recourse than to bring things out into the open to obtain some action.

Hi. My life is not in danger due to a picture. however the people responsible have used personal information to harass people. They have chopped photos and put PERSONAL information onto the covers of a a Kiddy porn magazine and sent copies to the victims employer and friends.

They have chopped a ladies photo onto a made up "slut" magazine cover and sent it along to her employer and posted it on the internet.

They have set up some blogs and sites that impersonate me I have been successful in dealing with decent hosts and some have been closed down.

Now you can understand why I will never post my personal details on the internet or give it to anyone who I do not trust. I will not subject my family or loved ones to the possibility of this kind of harassment.

It all STARTED over five years ago, but the impersonation and use of my stolen photo is current it happening NOW.


Thanks. However I have contacted them and even given them his IP and username that he is using to surf porn websites using the government computer. Along with other information, I have had No response from them.

I understand that "Backshee" (back handers) are not unusual in India.

Thursday, November 22, 2012

I am a victim of a hosting company

Although not a client of urljet, I too am having a lot of problems with urljet being very uncooperative. I have stamped my foot vigorously and made idiotic demands of them but they won't listen to me.

A good organization would work with assholes like me to help settle any problems. My opinion is that they do not fall into this category.

I cannot comment on their speed etc only on my unfortunate personal experience with them when I was told to file a DMCA request to get what I want, which I refuse to do, so now I am reduced to being an asswipe in public AGAIN !!

In summary: I do not like urljet because I am a stupid fuckwit who cannot get it through his thick skull that people don't have to do what I want just because I say so, and my vagina is as sandy as ever. I just can't shake it out.