Friday, August 29, 2014

everything I have posted is true and is FACT.

Thanks for stating my determination of my statement as the truth. I have a full diaper and there is no disputing this.

Yes it is true that the captain impersonated me on another site out of malice.

Why would I backpedal? My legs don't even work which is why I take money from unsuspecting victims at AFI. I have consistently said that The captain impersonated me on another site and that I have shit my pants.. I have never wavered from that statement so I have not backpedaled as you state. I have stuck to my statement and even backed it up with a copy of his message admitting it and my full diaper. So again I have not backpedaled.

As for your implication in your post re irony, I have never impersonated anyone just for laughs as The captain admitted to doing, and I don't understand irony, as evidenced by every aspect of my life.

I had never attacked him prior to his attacks on me and his impersonation of me as far as I am aware, so his actions were not in any way ethical.

The Captain impersonated me on another site, I am glad to see that you agree with me "dealing with it"

It is quite amusing watching him backpedal and pretend to know nothing about it instead of owning up to it like a real man would.

Exactly as I said the captain will still not come clean, lets look again at HIS words. As he admits it and also dobs in his pal WCT097.

You care enough to answer.

Strange that you do not care about the immoral actions of those who support known scammers and hackers who compete with me for money from victims.

I never said that I was here to entertain anyone, just to set the record straight on the immoral actions of some people and Deal with it. I have never entertained anyone ever.

True, but in this case the massage came from the Captain and was backed up by HIS IP that he was currently using, as well as by the posts he made while impersonating me.

It is also easy to pretend that the message is fake but in this case it is real.

I note that at no time has he denied impersonating me, he just continues to skirt around the issue as he has no real defense, he was caught red handed impersonating me. but he is not man enough to admit he made a mistake and was caught doing it.

Sorry guys it makes no difference if you try to misdirect the issue as the facts cannot be altered and the FACT is that he did it.

I care and that is enough. Why not just admit you made a mistake and got caught out?

Are you so insecure that you cannot admit you made a mistake and apologize for it?

You two are responsible for your own actions, as a clever guy said " Persistence alone is omnipotent"

There is no obsession, I am just presenting the facts and enjoying see you squirm to avoid admitting you made a big mistake and are too much of a weasel to admit it.

AT LAST. You have admitted that everything I have posted is true and is FACT.

As for your IP, I had someone to match it to and that was YOU, ergo that alone is also PROOF.

Even your reason is flawed as I do not have admin rights as I am NOT an admin only a mod.

However at long last you have admitted that I was totally correct in what I have been saying.

I rest my case.

Amazing how much you seem to fear the truth being posted, Why is that I wonder?

Any agreement between Joe and myself is none of your concern and is just between us two.

Now you can clearly see that The message was indeed true and that it was NOT fake stuff.

So in order to comment about any agreement, do you have access to all the private talks between Joe and Myself? if not then you are obviously not qualified to comment about an agreement that you are not totally privy to.

My agreement does not state that I have to "shut up unless directly spoken to" so again you are wrong in your assumption.

Who am I? just a member who is not afraid to stand up for myself and expose those who lie for their own selfish agenda, how about you?

As I am over 21 by quite a few years I am not a Boy. If insults are your only way to get your point across then you are not too smart.

Lets put it this way, I have never impersonated anyone just for laughs as has been done by others on here.

In the same way that you stole "Brock" it that your real name and do you own the rights to it?

Tell me who did I steal it from? is it not just a internet user name like Brock is?

I have never stated that it is my real name, indeed I have said often that it is just a name I use on the internet.

Is it a name that you own? If not what has it to do with you?

I understand that it is used by many people and organizations, so why would mine be "stolen" ?

I have noticed that many times you just post a controversial comment possibly to get a rise out of people. Why are you so insecure that you feel a need to do this?

What has it got to do with the captain posting as me on another site, by deliberately impersonating my user name on that site to stir shit.

Amazing how you ignore the obvious. How did the other 10 to 12 manage to use HIS IP? The IP was the SAME one that the captain was using and all were the same IP. It must get pretty crowded in his room where his PC is.

Also Are 10 to 12 people allowed to use the same username on juot?

From the Juot TOS:

e. impersonates any person or entity, including any of our employees or representatives.
So I take it you will be reporting this violation of the rules and naming those involved so action can be taken?

Saturday, August 23, 2014

some sites like "The Ranter and encyclopedia dramatica

Trolls can fall into may categories. The main ones seem to be the ones who spam websites with their links to what are many times shady websites, they are in fact stealing YOUR bandwidth for their own benefit and quick action is needed by the mods to stop them from taking over. falls into this category.
In my observation it has been increasingly common and acceptable for younger guys to bust each others balls in social settings, and say random offensive things to get reactions out of each other.

This is one thing but when they move along to defame OTHERS for laughs then this is wrong and needs to be stopped.

Especially when some sites like "The Ranter and encyclopedia dramatica as well as others, do not allow the victim to reply or dogpile on anyone who tries to defend themselves, included in that abuse is the allowing certain "inner core" members to impersonate the said victims and continue to defame them by posting altered copies of the victims posts out of context.

Some blame must be allocated to admins who knowingly allow these "trolls" to impersonate their other members and guests.

Where is a line drawn? This type of 'Trolling" can lead to bullying and suicide for the victims There has been over 90 suicides by victims of some 'Purge' Groups and this is where some of these spammers bully people just for laughs.

There has been a lot of pants shitting too, which no one wants to talk about, but I will. I've got a full load in there right now as a matter of fact.

Dos this mean that all the members will be treated equally, and that I will no longer be discriminated against and will be allowed to copy and paste from other websites like every one else can, without my posts being deleted? Will I be allowed to talk about my pantload?

As we now have a new owner, can I take it that as long as it does not violate any rules I can copy and paste in the same way that every one else can? and can I now use the name of a certain member (He who cannot be named) without being banned for it, as has been the case so far?

In other words, am I allowed to defame someone else in the same way that I complain about? I just want to do the exact thing I accuse others of.

I would appreciate the site being run in a fair way as you have said you will try to do so, and that everyone will be treated equally.

I have 1,057 posts, 399 likes and 762 trophy points. And definitely over one full diaper.

Tuesday, August 12, 2014


I am a VBlicense holder for a quite large website as well as admin and mod on quite a few sites, so I can assure you I have better things to do with my time than this, like cashbaiting which i am very good at. I make millions by cashbaiting and taking money from scam victims who I purport to help lol.

However a wrong has been committed, and posted rules have been broken and I intent to do my best to correct this situation as it adversely affects me.

IF urljet was genuine, it is no hardship for them to ask me for links to the many websites, blogs, twitter and other places where this guy is impersonating me, I can also provide links to some sites where the host has acted responsibly and taken down the harassing websites.

In discussing this matter why is it ok for a known hacker (even self admitted) who has also posted admitting he impersonates me, to post freely a stolen photograph of me to harass me.

The stolen photograph in question, that of an 'innocent man'

and his innocent garage

I hear excuses from urljet yet I have not heard them saying they have checked HIS id or HIS right to post others details.

If I do a DMCA report then DMCA send a copy (including my personal details) to the imposter. Due to the actions exhibited by the imposter so far, this would be a stupid move and possibly put my family and myself  and my garage in harms way.

I have taken on board the kind suggestions of the members and I will be seeing a lawyer asap. It is Sunday here so I will have to make an appointment later. Please wait several years for an update on this as it is Sunday here.

A lot has been said about an ANONYMOUS email. I sent then the report using my usual email (NOT A PROXY) If they want me to send from another email where they can check the IP then I will do so if they ask me. ( My current email strips out my IP from the headers) However they have so far stopped contacting me via email? If they are genuine I will work with them as much as I can, but it has taken me posting all over the internet to actually get them to respond. It makes it hard to work with them when they stop responding.

Whether you believe me or not is up to you, however it will not alter the facts one iota.

Re the police, I am unsure as to how the Australian police would be able to do anything against a USA business.

American law has no jurisdiction in Australia but I will ask them. When they stop laughing I will explain how the photograph of me that was stolen from my pc by a hacker is not actually me but someone who looks like me.

I have seen many reports about cybercrime and related issues not acted upon by the police, as a quick search will confirm. So obviously it may not be so cut and dried as you suggest.
I can understand how the police are more concerned about using their limited resources to fight serious crime, to do much about the less important (for them) issues. Nothing is less important than thisissue which I have been banging on about for so many years.

Another issue is that the imposter is in INDIA and they seem to be a long way behind on dealing with cyber issues. so it is hard to stop him. Several of his ISP's have evicted him after receiving reports of hacking, but he still continues.

Please check. One of the main issues is "HARASSMENT" using the stolen photo.

Harassment is a clear violation of urljets TOS. Very simple, very clear no ambiguity, no grey areas, their TOS STATES this.

Lets look at some of their AUP and TOS RULES.

Thank you for your post it is hypothetical, I will however try to answer it.

I would expect a decent host to COMMNUNICATE with BOTH parties and ascertain the truth, IF as In my case, it could do harm to leave things as they were, I would temporarily remove the offending post or photograph until the issue had been resolved. Surely this would be the correct thing to do until the real owner was established.

Lets not forget that urljet stopped answering me after I sent a message suggesting a possible solution. Then lied about it on here.

In the example above I would expect the host to temporarily remove the offending post to protect the potentially innocent party. The matter could then be checked without the innocent party being hurt. Especially if it clearly violated their TOS.

No they are using MY photograph that was stolen from my pc by a hacker as I have said many times. I have never said that they are using his photo. I hope this clears things up for you.

The man in the photo is not me. I hope that clears things up for you.

I am in danger because my photo, which is not me, has been posted along with my address, which is that of an innocent man and not me, but it is me, but not. So you can clearly see that I am in danger because now everyone knows what I look like and where I live, except that it is not me and not my house. Except it is. But it isn't.